Peter Tillers' Home Page


 

Federal Rules of Evidence





Advanced Evidence: Evidence in Sexual Misconduct Cases

Spring Semester, 2009
Professor Peter Tillers
Cardozo School of Law


Outline & Syllabus


Outline of Topics
(see further below for detailed syllabus & assignments)


Law schools teach the important skill of close reading of texts. However, it is also important to read widely. The emphasis in the assignments below is on wide reading rather than close reading. This is because I believe it is possible to get a good feel for many evidentiary issues in sexual misconduct cases only if one has a sense of what the entire landscape of proof problems in sexual misconduct cases looks like. This does not mean we will forego close analysis of specific evidence problems. In our class sessions I will discuss, for example, some of the fine points of various rules of evidence. But I hope that this sort of fine-grained analysis will take place against the backdrop of your general feel for problems of evidence in the area that occupies our attention in a given week.


Pre-Semester Reading Assignment

During the break before the spring semester buy the following book at amazon.com or a similar online service and read as much of the book you can before the semester begins: Dorothy Rabinowitz, No Crueler Tyrannies: Accusation, False Witness, and Other Terrors of Our Times (2004) (paperback).


 

Topic 1: Introduction: Survey of Topics and Problems

Assignment (see further below)

Topic 2: The Character Evidence Rule & Evidence of Other Sexual Wrongs

Assignment

Topic 3: Rape Shield Laws

Assignment

Topic 4: Legal Standards Governing Scientific & Expert Evidence: A Mini-Refresher Course

Assignment

Topic 5: Pretrial Questioning of Child Victims in Sexual Molestation Cases

Assignment

Topic 6: Memory & Truth: Hypnosis, Guided Imagery, Repressed Memory & Similar Matters

Assignment

Topic 7: Syndromes (Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome & the Like)

Assignment

Topic 8: Statistics, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) & Criminal Homicide

Assignment

Topic 9: Privileges & Fair Trial

Assignment

Topic 10: Sex Abuse Scandal as Social and Legal Wildfire?

Assignment

Topic 11: Paper Presentations

Assignment

Topic 12: Paper Presentations

Assignment

Topic 13: Paper Presentations

Assignment

Topic 14: Paper Presentations

Assignment


Syllabus & Assignments


Pre-Semester Reading Assignment

During the break before the spring semester buy the following book at amazon.com or a similar online service and read as much of the book as you can before the semester begins: Dorothy Rabinowitz, No Crueler Tyrannies: Accusation, False Witness, and Other Terrors of Our Times (2004) (paperback).

This book is required reading because it touches on the wide variety of issues -- political, ideological, cultural, psychological, sociological, familial, and religious -- that can be involved in legal actions that involve claims of sexual misconduct. Be sure to finish reading the book by the third week of the semester.

 


Topic 1

Introduction

Apart from the Rabinowitz book (see above) there is no assignment for the first class.

 


Topic 2

The Character Evidence Rule & Evidence of Other Sexual Wrongs

Note on the prohibition against "circumstantial" character evidence.

The Common Law Character Rule & Federal Rules of Evidence 404 & 405

Lustful Disposition and Depraved Sexual Instinct Cases
Woods v. State of Indiana (1968)

State of Maryland v. Westpoint (2008) (Toward the end of this wide-ranging opinion, the court discusses the use of other sex crime evidence to show depraved sexual disposition and explains that Mayland recognizes a "limited" "sexual propensity exception"; "In Acuna, 332 Md. at 65, 629 A.2d at 1233, we further explored the 'sexual propensity' exception and explained that it is different from the other exceptions. Unlike the latter, where the other acts evidence is admissible only because it has special relevance to prove intent, motive, absence of mistake, identity, or common scheme, sexual propensity evidence is admissible to prove conformity with past conduct....")

State of Utah v. Doporto (1997) (this decision provoked a legislative backlash)

Stte of Colorado v. Rath (2002) (this opinion takes a certain kind of logic about the character evidence rule to an extreme; figure out why the court's logic is, at a minimum, troublesome)

&&&

Federal Rules of Evidence 413-415 & their Legislative history

&&&

Bingaman v. State of Alaska (2003) (comprehensive discussion of Alaska's Rules of Evidence 404(b)(2)-(4), which authorize admission of prior sexual molestation, prior sexual assaults, and prior domestic violence)

&&&

Read Sections 2 - 2.1.1.2.3 in my Notes on Character Evidence

  • For a quick refresher on the character evidence rule in general read or skim Section 1.

  • Topic 3

    Rape Shield Laws

    FRE 404(a)(2) & Advisory Committee Note
    Federal Evidence Rule 608 & Advisory Committee Note
    Federal Evidence Rule 412
    Section 2.2.2 of Material on Rape Victim Shield Laws (to be revised & updated)

    Davis v. Alaska
    Olden v. Kentucky


    Topic 4

    A Mini-Refresher-Course on Legal Standards Governing Scientific & Expert Evidence

    Frye v. United States (1923)

    Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993)

    Kumho Tire Company, Ltd v. Carmichael (1999)

    Federal Rule of Evidence 702 & Legislative history of 2000 amendment


    Topic 5

    Pretrial Questioning of Child Victims in Sexual Molestation Cases

    Main Topic: Pretrial Questioning of Child Victims; Some Legal Issues: Witness Competence; Confrontation and Cross-Examination, and Due Process

    State of New Jersey v. Michaels

    Read and watch Techniques in Interviewing Children (including the linked video material), from THE CHILD TERROR (1998) (FRONTLINE TV program)

    Suggested readings & books:

    Stephen J. Ceci, Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony (1999)

    Stephen J. Ceci, Expert Witnesses in Child Abuse Cases: What Can and Should Be Said in Court (2001) 

    Thomas D. Lyon, "The New Wave in Children's Suggestibility Research: A Critique," 84 Cornell Law Review 1004 (1999)

    Stephen J. Ceci & Richard D. Friedman, "The Suggestibility of Children: Scientific Research and Legal Implications," 86 Cornell Law Review 33 (2000)

    Stephen J. Ceci, Sarah Kulkofsky, J. Zoe Klemfuss, Charlotte D. Sweeney & Maggie Bruck, "Unwarranted Assumptions about Children’s Testimonial Accuracy," 3 Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 307 (2007)


    Topic 6

    Memory and Truth: Hypnosis, Guided Imagery, Repressed Memory & Similar Matters

    How does memory work?

  • "I'm glad you asked that question. Well, actually, I'm not."

  • Wikipedia on memory 

    Skeptic's Dictionary (by Robert Todd Carroll) on memory

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on memory

    The following book in paperback is inexpensive and if you are particularly interested in sex-related evidentiary issues implicating human memory (and a multitude of sex-related evidentiary issues do so), you should probably buy this book: Daniel L. Scachter, The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers (Mariner Books, 2002)

    Legal Issues

    Hypnosis

    People v. Shirley (1982)
    People v. Hughes (1983)
    Rock v. Arkansas (1987)
    For the U.S. Supreme Court's later (re-)interpretation of Rock, see United States v. Scheffer (1998).

    Repressed Memory

    Hungerford
    Paul Ingram
    Logerquist
    Quattrocchi 1; Quattrocchi 2; Quattrocchi 3
    Shahzade (memory supposedly repressed for 40+ years and then reawakened)

    Memory Studies

    Eliabeth Loftus, The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse (1996) (available in paperback)

    August Piper, Linda Lillevik & Roxanne Kritzer, "What's Wrong with Believing in Repression?: A Review for Legal Professionals,"14 Psychology, Public Policy & Law 223 (2008) (an important article)

    Further reading:

    Some journal articles about memory
    Some books about memory

    Constitutional limits on retroactive extensions of statutes of limitations periods for criminal prosecutions:

    Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003) (this case involved extension of limitations period for "sex-related child abuse crimes"; the extension was held unconstitutional)

     


    Topic 7

    Syndromes

    Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome; Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome; Rape Trauma Syndrome; Battered Spouse Syndrome; Death Row Syndrome; Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy; Battered Child Syndrome;  Battered Patient Syndrome; Justice Obsession Syndrome; Organic Delusional Syndrome

    Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62 (1991) (battered child syndrome)
    People v. Bledsoe, 681 P.2d 291 (Cal. 1984) (rape trauma syndrome)
    Cal. Evidence Code Section 1107

    David L. Faigman, "The Battered Woman Syndrome and Self-Defense: A Legal and Empirical Dissent," 72 Virginia Law Review 619 (1986)

    Robert P. Mosteller, "Syndromes and Politics in Criminal Trials and Evidence Law," 46 Duke Law Journal 461 (1996)

    David L. Faigman & Amy J. Wright, "The Battered Woman Syndrome in the Age of Science," 39 Arizona Law Review 67 (1997)

    John Monahan, Laurens Walker & Gregory Mitchell, "Contextual Evidence of Gender Discrimination: The Ascendance of 'Social Frameworks,'" 94 Virginia Law Review 1715 (2008)

    Note: selected cases on syndrome evidence


    Topic 8

    Statistics, SIDS & Homicide
    (What is this topic doing here?)


    Wilson v. Maryland

    Simulated dice games that illustrate the product rule (assuming independence):

    1, 2, 6, or 9 dice; 1,10, 20, or 100 rolls

    two dice; results

    1 or 2 dice thrown up to 500x
    Prosecutor's Fallacy (which mathematicians view as an example of the more general fallacy of transposing probabilities)


    The Sally Clark Case:

    Sally Clark - victim of a miscarriage of justice

    Blog, July 14, 2005: SIDS a/k/a Cot Death & the Doctrine of Chances in the UK: The Sally Clark Case

    Blog, Dec. 3, 2003: SIDS, Statistics, Accidents, Genetics, & Criminal Guilt – and, for Connoisseurs of the Law of Evidence, the "Doctrine of Chances"

    Helen Joyce, Beyond Reasonable Doubt

    Compilation of Well-Reasoned Newspaper Articles about Sally Clark Case

    "Sally Clark Doctor Wins GMC case" -- BBC Feb. 17, 2006

    Wikipedia: Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Sally Clark Case
    Cf. Evaluating Legal Evidence
    N.B. Sally Clark apparently committed suicide on March 15, 2007. See this Wikipedia entry

    &&&


    Background Material on Probabilities



    Topic 9

    Privileges & Fair Trial

    In re Winship (1970)
    United States v. Lindstrom (1983)
    Pennsylvania v. Ritchie (1987)
    Jaffee v. Redmond (1996)


    Topic 10

    Sex Abuse Scandals as Social and Legal Wildfires?

    The "Day Care Mass Sex Abuse Scandals" of the 1980s and early 1990s

    Oprah Winfrey, Geraldo Rivera & "Believe the Children"

    Review:

    People of New Jersey v. Michaels
    The Paul Ingram Case

    Skim:

    The Child Terror
    Innnocence Lost

    Review:

    Dorothy Rabinowitz's book (see above)

     

    The "Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal": A New Wildfire?

    Selected Blogs
    Stream-of-Consciousness Commentary on the "Catholic Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal"

    Further (optional) reading: Philip Jenkins, PEDOPHILES AND PRIESTS: ANATOMY OF A CONTEMPORARY CRISIS (Oxford University Press, 1996); Marci Hamilton, GOD VS. THE GAVEL (2007)

    Updates:

    Survivors snap into action
    Not in My Back Yard: Homeless Sex Offenders
    SNAP website
    SNAP 2009 conference

    Episcopalian clergy...

    ...perhaps do it too.

    The FLDS case

    Blog: "A Civil Liberties Disaster"

    Hell fire & brimstone: the the denunciation (& dehumanization?) of sexual offenders


    Topic 11

    Paper Presentations


    Topic 12

    Paper Presentations


    Topic 13

    Paper Presentations


    Topic 14

    Paper Presentations




    Federal Rules of Evidence

     




    Peter Tillers' Home Page